The Middle East uprising is without doubt related to Revelations and The Holy Qur’an similar, absorbed text, which I have not read. See all the references of “tribes” in Revelations, rising up, or maybe awakening from being dead. This event is too epic not to be questioned as being part of an End of Days event. See my blog on BP Oil Spill 2012 End of Day Global Cooling Carbon Sink Bomb for an understanding of the physical mechanisms I discovered back in 2007 when I self published my H2onE2 book.
_________________________________________________________
Before I start the blog, let’s first get straight why the entire middle east erupted all at once, because this has been left unexplained by the media.
First – Starting July 2010 Russian fires raged across their grain belt / crop lands due to a massive drought and record high temperatures. Note, these were the same conditions experienced prior to the 1920’s American Dust Bowl along with a record cold winter. In a blog of my radio show notes, on the American Holocaust, I found enough proof to say the pre-American Dust Bowl fires were possible intentionally set to burn out the farmers to steal their oil rich lands. I see no reason, why not question the Russian Fires, as no act of magical God. The blog is here http://dustbowlwpaart.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/hello-world/
Second – Russia’s announcement Aug. 5 2010 that it will stop exporting wheat and other grains products because the fires destroyed a large percentage of the export crops.
Third – Russian is the largest distributor of wheat and grain to Egypt, Iraq, Tunisia and other Middle Eastern countries.
Fourth – Wheat prices skyrocket in the Middle East and the population begins to rebel.
Although, expressed as democracy protests by the media, I believe they are more related to beginning as hunger protests.
_______________________________________________________________________
Blog starts here…………………………
Author B Billy Mars – Professional Geologist
Writer of the H2onE2 and H3onE3 works
Feb 11, 2001
The Egypt Model of a revolution needs to be studied to see if its methods can be applied to other regimes such as a hijacked Wall Street corporate United States government or a runaway tyrant EU country. The question is not if a government will get hijacked by the wealthy elite and corporations, but only when this will happen, this will happen. After writing my H2onE2 and H3onE3 I believe strongly the wealthy elite have a well designed method of control and suppression that can only be compared to as a dictator. Really, it blows me and many other economic analysts “Keiser Report RT” that the American people are not protesting in the streets right now. So we need to make a comparison between the Egyptians and other country populations to explore why the Americans are so docile and able to be easily manipulated by Wall Street and politically suppressed by the media.
The Egypt Model of a revolution requires two powerful forces to go up against a political regime, one the protesting people and two, full time 24 hour live satellite news coverage. I don’t believe a semi peaceful revolution can have one without the other. The exception was found in the Tunisia example which did not receive 24 hour news coverage but still fell to the peoples will. This is because the small size of Tunisia, which just has one major city capital and a population below 10 million would be much easier to form resistance publicly. 24 hour news would not be required in this example. If we look at both Yemen and Algeria, these protests have not received 24 hour live news coverage and it is noted that their protesters failed to perjure political change, unlike Egypt.
Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, Algeria, ext. all of middle earth shut down Internet services and access to accounts such as facebook and twitter, so these entities are useful for organization purposes, but not required. The real force to a semi-peaceful political revolution outside the will of the people, rests solely in the hands of 24 hour satellite TV coverage. No, 24 hour news coverage, means a failed revolt.
Al Jazeera is the most publically open political Arab news channel on satellite TV, when Al-Arabiya was founded and bankrolled to the tune of some $300 million by a group of wealthy Saudi and Kuwaiti princesses. Al-Arabiya was designed to serve as a counterweight to the more uncompromising and politically open Al Jazeera. So the Egyptian model solely required Al Jazeera to direct 24 hour live news coverage because Al-Arabiya, CNN, BBC, ext all will not participate as this required second force. Other stations will report on events, with some level of truth, but not initiate the full force of 24 hour live coverage, required to meet the Egypt Model to a semi-peaceful revolution.
Political regimes are not stupid either and they know, when 24 hour live satellite media coverage gets turned on, they have to shut it down. I know this, so I assume both Hosni Mubarak and Al Jazeera all understand the power of 24 hour live nonstop media coverage. So how did Al Jazeera keep reporting on events while the Hosni Mubarak security forces were making attempts to shut them down. The Egyptian security personal were documented as breaking reporters cameras, turning off cell phones and all other interactive media devises able to transmit 24 hour live coverage. I believe very strongly that Al Jazeera or their reporters, rigged Egypt’s Liberation Square with hidden cameras that could send live satellite video out. As soon as the Egyptian police found one camera and shut it down, Al Jazeera would just turn on another satellite video camera. The next Easter egg hunt to shut this newly activated camera would than begin. If all the cameras were removed prior to other News stations reporting live on the event this semi-peaceful revolt would end.
This also explains why the Egyptians refused to leave Liberation Square. They knew once they left the square and the safety of live satellite coverage they would be massacred. Sun Tzu in his “Art of War” states: You can ensure the safety of your defense if you only hold positions that cannot be attacked. Although, there were skirmishes along the borders of Liberation Square, live media coverage meant, Sun Tzu criteria from the “Art of War” was followed. Basically the Egypt revolution took place because they were able to insure “safety of their defenses” via live 24 hour Satellite coverage. The protesters in Yemen, Algeria and Libya do not meet the criteria of Sun Tzu, which means you cannot have a semi peaceful revolution under the Egyptian Model. So I am sorry to say people of Yemen, Algeria and Libya, you will be forced to run, fight or die in the masses and you most likely will still not get any change.
Now, if Al Jazeera has political ambitions, I don’t know? What I do know is that the USA media has been able to pick and chose two political candidates, often members of the same secret society, while a large expanse of the American public, mostly believe they are participating in a real democracy. So does Al Jazeera want to influence the political processes in Egypt, no one knows? Also if large protests take place in the United States because of a hijacked ruling elite Wall Street government, will Al Jazeera also direct 24 hour live news coverage here, again we don’t know?
One of the more interesting elements of the Egypt revolution can be found in the responses from every government leader. The US regime and EU puppet leaders were completely taken by surprise, back peddling through response statements that were contradicting, unprepared and flip floppy. This is rather amazing since the world’s governments spend so much money on intelligence to know these events are going to take place and how to respond to them publically. Al Jazeera and the Egyptians made every government leader look like complete idiots.
Every new response from a government leader became more and more outlandishly and ridiculous. The largest piece of cake was taken by Hillary Clinton, when her statement to the press argued that the Egyptian revolution should abide by the constitutional law of Egypt, which required Hosni Mubarak to remain in place to perform political reform. This means that a dictator of some 30 years of power was required to remain in place to bring about political reform; “laughing my ass off”.
I would not doubt that every world’s government, including the US regime and EU puppet leaders were hot calling Hosni Mubarak telling him to take care of this problem fast and now before it gets out of hand. This makes more sense than the world leaders actually calling Mubarak to tell him to step down; haha that’s a joke right. What makes more sense is the Obama administration, calling Mubarak to tell him to put a sniper on a roof and throw fire bombs at them; this I could believe.
I will include the leader’s statement below in the timeline section of events because they are extremely important and equally interesting. Also when Hillary Clinton volunteered to help Egypt in their effort to re-forming a new democracy, well this was also rather obnoxious. But, it was not just the USA political dummies, the world wrote the Egyptians off and very little support was organized anywhere. I would say the world and its population was tuned in, but only to watch your population be shot into pieces.
On February 16th 2011, the American Congress held an emergency meeting with all the heads of the CIA Central Intelligence Agency including the Director Leon Panetta to find out why they were not warned of the Egyptian Revolution. And, if you are not unable to interpret what is happening live on TV how are you ever going to stop groups like al-Qaeda? This Congressional hearings on February 16th 2011, with CIA Director Leon Panetta were actually rather interesting and clearly showed whose side the administration is on. Panetta told the American Congress that the threats to the USA are Al-Qaeda and an Internet threat, which he failed to elaborate on. Well is the CIA afraid of an Intellectual Terrorists, a master mind of some sorts or pornography, sexy pictures or snuff films? Panetta left this threat unclear or what measures would be used to stop it. But, apparently the threat, left un-described, of course is a force equal to that of Al-Qaeda.
Egypt is no joke, I would say the most important country in the Middle East and maybe anywhere in the world, for two reasons, the Suez Canal and its government has worked hand in hand, to hide a truthful interpretation to the richest world history. See my Video “Pyramid and Eye Secret Solved” for an explanation or get and read my H2onE2 book. The hidden history of ancient Egypt is so toxic, the ruling elite from around the world cannot have Egypt as an open democracy. This is truly not an option, lose control of Egypt, lose control of interpreting history and you empower a country that can influence the entire region’s governments with the Suez Canal and much beyond with control of the history.
I would say if the Egyptians, keep your mouth shut for now on the history, the world’s governments will uncontrollably pour money into your country. You might have to titillate the world’s governments into sending you money, we will call aid, by performing high profile monthly media events of new discoveries, unearthed during the revolution but it will totally work because remember you got the big point things, and they don’t. Other countries have oil, lumber an enslaved workforce, Egypt you now control history, which means, you can even make shit it up to perform the titillation processes. But, you don’t have to, the history behind the large pointy things, is so toxic you should all be driving Mercedes-Benz just like any oil rich Kuwaiti citizen.
Let’s not to forget to detail the Suez Canal and how control of that can influence the entire region. The fact is a democratic Egypt could vote to not have any military weapons transit the canal. Any and all military weapons, mostly used to suppress other democratic movements will be confiscated. This is by the way, what I would do. Don’t forget Europe’s drug habit all gets transported through the Suez Canal, including all of the Afghanistan lovely lovely heroin. Most likely being distributed now by USA army officers, seeing that is what they did during the Vietnam War.
These are just some of the reasons, a democratic Egypt just cannot happen. Right now, every elitist and government leader throughout the entire world is thinking of how to circumvent Egypt’s democracy movement and these are not stupid people. The Egyptians are going to go up against the world, which will quickly erupt into a newly created World War. Why, because only a World War type of conflict will get another military dictator to lead Egypt. I understand, you want a better life for your children and people but you are standing on a pile of treasure and also a pile of shit.
We will have to examine the population of Egypt and make a comparative study to other populations, including the United States. The rather unique characteristic of the Egypt population when comparing it to other Arab countries, is they might have the largest educated population that earns the least amount of money. Being surrounded by an amazing ancient history has been one driving force for a personal need to discover knowledge. The Egyptians are also very tech savvy. Unlike the American educated population the Egyptian educated work force does not live an upper class life style. Most educated Egyptians make a meager living only slightly better than the uneducated work force.
Also, unique to the Egyptians education system is that their schools are not strongly divided into an upper and lower class education systems. To start off, Egypt does not have upper class Ivey league schools or fraternity organizations. This means there is no education ruling party, which the elite would then graduate from. This is a really important factor, for instance if I said with the full power of my small ghetto college science degree in the same science curriculum, even utilizing the same books, for example that the sky is yellow when some Yale or Harvard scientist determined the sky is orange, socially, through a class system, I would be over ruled. The American culture openly accepts this class separation, which means they accept their fate.
Absent from the Egyptian education system is the fraternity organization system, designed to psychologically train students into being scum bags and rapists. Why because corporations and the governments require these type of workers to fill the high end upper class jobs? Here, I can use another example, if I said with the full power of my small job as an environmental analyst/sampler that the contamination can be found here when an senior EPA regulator who graduated from Yale or Harvard, same science degree, same books, determined the contamination is not present, socially through a class system structure, I would again be over ruled. This class system structure is not as prevalent in Egypt.
I should also mention that in the USA, it is well accepted that the student is never an equal to a professor. The class system structure does not accept that the professor can be out smarted and outwit by his student, at any point. So the professor is part of the upper class ruling system and what knowledge they peddle from their class system, is accepted as never being fully and completely understood by their student. In the American system students are not even able to select their own books to study from. Every time I showed up to class with a pile of different study books my professor took offense to this. This is a subservient relationship when Egypt on the other hand this segregation is not present, everybody takes the same classes to acquire the same knowledge. The student is as intellectual and equal to the professor. They tend to work together and it is hard to determine a professor from a student on a project. When asking them, which one is the professor, the professor would respond, we are all professors.
There is no special understanding held by some designated upper class group, such as assumed by the Western professor. It is understood that the professor in Egypt releases all their knowledge to the student and they are now equally, able to interpret any material, without weighing it through a class structure. Any class system of course, is another layer of control able to be implemented by the ruling elite and these types of things were not well established in Egypt. Well, you could say frowned upon. Ask any Egyptian, which is the best school and they will respond with, “the one closest to where you live”, not some name of an Ivy League establishment with the highest class teachers. All these things I have been talking about, describes how, and why Liberation Square was filed with educated members of society, able to develop and stick to a game plan, the Egyptian model of a revolution.
The Egyptians, I personally worked with on a science project turned out to be high level professors in their own country and were very well educated, charming, sincere and personable. I was surprised to find out their pay was only 2 times higher than a bread baker or most other working class Egyptians. All three were held up in a flophouse dorm no different than mine. From what I learned from them, is that Egyptian medical doctors and even lawyers were not paid nearly enough to meet their educational commitment and its hefty costs to acquire. Well, I found out Egypt has an impoverished educated class. Basically all these factors meant that in Liberation square there were not brutish hoodlums like me, but engineers, scientist and even medical doctors supporting the effort of democracy. In America, or for that matter most EU countries, your democratic movement will not have support of the educated community, unless they are their to derail an effort.
The type of education in America, which I am not sure how it differentiated from that in Egypt, is based on absorption not interpretation or problem solving. The CIA workers did not know the Egyptian revolution was taking place even while they watched it on the news. Why, because their worker force are not able to problem solve. The American school system is based on random memorization, which comes from an absorption based learning system. American students, can tell you when the wheel was invented, how it functions but not how to make a better wheel. They can only analyze results based solely on their educational indoctrination. Americans are trained to be almost unable to be inventive, think on their feet or solve arising problems. I think this is not the case within the Egyptian education system.
These structures differentiate the Egyptian population to that of the well classed system within the American or EU populations. The American population is much too divide by the media, into a social hierarchal system, no different than that seen in the 18th and 19th century, with the master and slaves bondage system; just more complex and expansive. We think in terms of master and slave, but there is another important group, which are not well understood and this is the slave trader, sellers and trainers, operators or manages. In ancient Rome, a farm manager was called a Vilicus, and he supervised the work of the slaves. In the American south, the managers where just called that or estate managers or maybe an Over-Seer. Since, now the economy has modernized, there are new positions that need to be filled by estate managers or Vilicuses, to grow the class system structure.
We all know who the estate managers are, they come from Ivey League schools, from college Greek fraternities, and they are members of secret societies like the Freemasons. EU and America has a very well established class system of leadership and rule, even better defined than ancient Rome. Egypt did not have this organized class system, you either were in favor of the regime or tossed out into general population . The Egyptians only faced Mubarak and a small group of ruling elite. They had few Over-Seers, which could infiltrate a movement, expose it and cut it off before it gets out of control. America is full of infiltrators who are able to alter any political movement. If an anti-Freemason movement started in America the first thing that will happen is it will fill with Freemasons.
The Freemason symbol of the eye watching over the rulers or pharaoh pyramid is a good example to an Over-seer, a slave manager on duty, ready and willing to whip the backs of any real democratic protesters. The Over-seers, in America have enough financial control to be able to lead, from the bottom up and develop false democratic movements, like the Tea Party or create fake well funded conspiracy sites like Alex Jones and his http://www.prisonplanet.com site. The Abbott and Costello satire on baseball called “Who’s on First” is a good example of these comedians subversively explaining that all the bases are covered and the established class system is well set up to rule the Americans population.
I saved the largest population comparison for last, America is psychologically and physically separated into many nations, not by states but along the racial divide. Let’s make this simple and say blue birds here, green feathered birds there, yellow to the right and a mix of vary defined different cultural / sexual beliefs over there; kind’a like the rainbow colored birds. Mostly these groups cannot agree on anything and don’t really like each other, often further separated by a strongly designed separatist media and news system who promotes conflicts between the different colored birds.
This is all designed to further separate the nation of nations by the ruling elite. They are not stupid, and this means gold in their banks, none in yours. Egypt did not have this issues or problems because Egypt is a uni-culture nation, they are all Egyptians and they all want to see other Egyptians do well and not be improvised, cut off from medical treatment, medicine, education, food, clean drinking water, ext. ext.. In American if one culture goes up the economic ladder, than it is excepted the other must go down. Racially speaking, these levels and promotions are monitored by all the different colored birds, which adds an un-mentionable social separation class layer or dimension. So Egypt has a healthy cultural bond when the underlining reality is, America has a failed cultural model, the elite have divided and now rule.
Lastly we need to mention the deference between religious community and controllers. In Egypt the religious organizations and there leaders were suppressed economically, publicly and socially by the Mubarak regime. The religious community in Egypt also desired a political voice in local, regional and world politics, just like any other entity. Their motives are quite clear and easily understood, since they boarder the Gaza stripe. Well, in the United States, the religious community holds the highest of high powers, they are extremely influential and secretly promote radical divisional groups such as the KKK, Tea Party, ext.. The religious authority in America has even gotten away with the molestation of an uncountable number of children, with near no impunity. The religious community in the USA is all powerful and has a very well organized plan to maintain social control. You will have to read my H3onE3 book to understand the difference between the sacrificial elements of the Christian internal sacrificial model and the external Muslim sacrificial element, its way to complicated to describe in a few lines.
Unlike Egypt, in the United States there is not one hand to battle with, to bring about political change and freedoms. This will be no bongo bongo party here. In the United States you have to revolt against the high god Kali and her consort Lord Shiva, which is the lord of death, darkness, violence with her earliest incarnation as a figure of annihilation. Kali is the right god to use as a comparison because he/she has many hands and in each hand holds a different sword you have to battle.
When the Egyptians only had to face one sword, the Egyptian military and police. In America there are layers to these forces that go all the way down to the bottom of society and even like a demon possessing their psych. See the Egyptian security forces are, just other Egyptians, when in America this is not the case. Some 75% or even more of the police force in America are not just police but also members of the Freemasons or similar, secret controlling societies. This means that an American based semi-peaceful revolt would be facing off again a double headed snake, which will have both a political directive and a secret one, no one is suppose to knows.
The stages involved in causing The Egypt Model of a revolt are planning, event/gathering, conflict, internal and world public appeal, which has to result with the movement gathering more of the population. The Egyptian model required self replication to grow and strengthen. Here we will talk about the details of the Egyptian revolt and mark any conflicts that could be see while applying their well tuned techniques to other nations. Egypt gave the world an example that worked, we just need to see if their methods can be apply outside Egypt and what differences could be encountered.
The Planning stage requires the organization of a large enough population group to hold a large scale peaceful event, but really an occupation. One of the January 25th movement people said, they trained on how to respond to confrontations and “if one person loses his cool or throws a rock at the army than the entire objective starts to fail”. Clearly when relating this to the American population, it would just take one fraternity member or Freemason to infiltrate a peaceful movement, to be able to derail the entire overall plan.
Interpreting responses to the event, it was obvious that the other governments did not know of the Revolt, or were politically prepared to handle this event. In the United States or any EU country the government will know what is going and at what scale. The surprise factor will be lost because infiltration of any movement will occur in the USA and in ever EU country. This is because of two factors, one their governments do spy on their populations and the upper class members of the Greek Fraternity system/Freemasons will also infiltrate these activities.
The tactics that the Egyptians implemented were pretty simple to follow and understand. They were peaceful but defensive, only resorting to violence to defend their ground or fort. The first rule was to not provoke the military into the struggle and to also show respect and build personable bonds with each military soldier. Conflict perked public and national response, so Mubarak would have been better served sending in peace offerings, like party cake and candy. The extreme cultural Muslim religious affliction to martyrdom is what did Mubarak in. So it was possibly necessary to provoke the police into a radical response, when they did not want to provoke the army.
Applying the Egyptian methods to other countries is the goal but I would make some additions to strengthen the movement. First, we have learned that mostly shields and stones are the weapons of conflict and personal defenses of such a struggle. I would add sling shots and many dollar store bags of marbles. There also seemed to be an ancient Greek type phalanx formation that formed so add 10 foot long sticks, sharpened and well oiled at the business end. Oil or greased at the end of the spear will mean it will be hard to be pulled away by the police or anti-democracy forces.
Utilizing the Greek phalanx military formation with 10 foot long sticks is not designed to kill but be a separation tool so pepper spray cannot be used as an offensive measure able to push back a crowed into a kill zone. Constant harassment from pointy sticks, knocking off police helmets will actually mean your effort can move forward and claim new ground and resources. Shields are required in the phalanx military formation and can also be used to defend against flying stones, I would suggest acquiring every trash can lids throughout the area. Add rope for the arm and hand handles. Double up the trash can lids to make them last longer. These shields are not designed to stop sword blows just flying rocks which seemed to do most of the injuries.
We learned with the Egyptian model the importance to wearing helmets; make them and take them. Weaving torn material can be fashioned into a primitive helmet and forearm protection. Any physical contact with riot police has one main goal and that is take their helmets and their shields. Also organize into units of 10 people, which belong to larger groups of a 100 people. These 10 people stick together and never part unless someone is injured, were by you would replace that 10th man and so on. Females are put into groups of 10 as well, because both good and bad people will be attracted to the events. Number the units and so on, elect group leaders and change them often so everyone learns the system. Have a simple plan and stick to it.
The Egyptians were smart not to leave Liberation Square and I was wrong to think flanking maneuvers would help their defenses. This is because Mubarak’s police were armed and would fire and kill, once the Egyptians left the safety of the 24 hour live media coverage. In the USA and in the EU, this will not be the case, riot police will not be issued guns or bullets because they could be taken away by the protesters. Organized offensive flanking maneuvers are possible in the USA and in EU countries. Always make attempts to out flank, even if they are fake attempts and don’t get cattled into a kill zone, unless it is a place you can hold and safely defend.
The Pro Mubarak forces did not have a plan or any leadership with any amount of intellectual capacity. When the Pro Mubarak forces performed the now, infamous camel, pony and donkey frontal assault at the center of the democracy forces, I thought to myself this is just unbelievable. Every kid that played with army men knows camels, ponies and donkeys are circus creatures, and do not go in the army men toy box, they go in the toy box with the clowns and shit you don’t play with. At 5 years old, not once did I ever consider performing a frontal assault with camels, ponies and donkeys at my little plastic army men. Well, maybe these Egyptians got a western education or were trained by the CIA as political analyst?
Flanking maneuvers are a lot like capture the flag, and what you do is send two large groups running at each side or corner of an adjacent street block. Why would you do this, well to acquire resources and expand your defense area and also to help win the psychological war? This is important, any anti protester forces trapped, will be immediately stripped of everything, removing their resources and released with a few hard spanks. Killing will only bring on killers. Demoralizing the opposition is a goal to win the psychological war. Also riot police come with extra weapons not pants, belts or shoes. This is about all I am willing to openly describe.
“How to defeat the Riot police”
The technique to defeat riot police is a lot like the paper, rock and scissors game. The riot police cannot defend against this type of approach or technique and are rendered useless, a non entity, only able to retreat and give up more and more ground.
Paper on the non violent technique to make riot police useless or obsolete link below……
http://www.h2one2.com/product.sc?productId=13&categoryId=1
The democracy protesters will face two very different forces, as seen by the Egyptian protests and other incidents, both need to be analyzed. The first force is that of the police and military. Police should be unarmed in western countries and armed and shooting in Asian or middle earth countries. The reverse is commonly the case in Asian and middle earth but this all depends on the countries and leadership. Although, if the military shows up in western countries it is almost certain they are armed with heavy weapons and not crowed control tools. As seen by the Egyptian model the military should not be confronted, challenged or insulted. Once the army has been called in, bye the way you have almost won, because the incident required such a response. Cheer their entrance into the event because it is a big deal. Do not challenge troops armed with guns, that is a no no, but do not let them take your fort. Do not give up your position, like a center square until leaders are removed.
The second force you will most likely encounter, are anti-protesters. This group appeared in every event from Egypt to Bahrain and it is assumed they will also show up in any western country. This is the really bad group to deal with because they will be armed with heavy offensive weapons. In their ranks will be police that are now wearing civilian clothes and do not did to act responsibly or within any UN conventions. The anti-protesters will have hand guns, knives and advanced projectile type weapons, even fire bombs. The ancient Greek phalanx type line will not form, you will be separated by a “No Man’s Land” of fling rocks, bricks and asphalt. If the anti-protesters group gets or feels trapped, they will shot their way out. Your best bet is to maintain a “No Man’s Land” until the army is forced to remove or separate this group. Taking prisoners is not advised and stick in tight bonded groups of 10 people. Relieve the entire group of 10 and take shifts organized in groups of 100, or 10 groups of 10.
Unlike Egypt, events in western countries are way different because these countries all have large central government cities full of anti-democracy gov workers. Protesters that enter, let’s say London, Paris, Rome or Washington DC face an entire city population of anti-democracy protesters. This is because, let’s say London, Paris, Rome or Washington DC all have entire work forces that works for the government. If you have ever experienced a government shut downs in London, Paris, Rome or Washington DC the streets are empty during rush hour, well it is like a ghost town. Most of this population lives a more comfortable life, with secure jobs, better schools, ext. Basically, the entire city would consist of Mubarak like supporters, including large the military personal groups. Cities such as, let’s say London, Paris, Rome or Washington DC have up to a million military personal that will show up in civilian clothes and quickly out number your peaceful democratic movement.
Many of these cities have organized events like a million man march, which are government controlled events. An independent democracy movement, will be looked at way differently and you will be labeled as anarchist, even anti-democracy groups or communists no matter what flag you wave around. The only option is to organize and shut down a nearby working class city, such as Baltimore Maryland and/or Richmond Virginia. From these external points it will be possible to move on the city capital if numbers grow. I have no idea what working class cities are outside London, Paris or Rome but it needs to be as close as possible and basically a safe staging area.
The UN, most impotently the Swiss, UK and American governments have the instant ability to stop all massacres and violence on civilians throughout middle earth. How, well because most of the wealth, controlled by these leaders massacring civilians, are in these countries? Freezing the assists of the leaders until the violence is ended, will instantly stop the massacre except in countries like Iran, which are almost completely cut off from the western world. Mubarak is widely reported to own property on Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills and Manhattan, freezing these assets stops the massacre instantly. Freezing his London assists means Mubarak’s family, wife and kids had no safe home to retreat to. It is possible that protests in these capitals might force this type of force to be taken, but none really developed.
Lastly, we need to explore the timeline of events. To understand any conflict, to my intellectual ability, I do two things, one write on the topic and two build the most detailed timeline possible. So here we will list the timeline of events for the Egyptian revolt which is always a work in progress and never completely finished.
Conclusion
Egypt cannot be free or out of the control of the elite for two reasons, one the entire EU Drug trade goes through the Suez Canal and two the TOXIC ancient history, so to get control back, the elite from around the world will be forced to create World War 3.
Timeline
January 25: Public protests erupt throughout Egypt in the thousands following an organized Internet campaign. Clashes break out in Cairo’s Tahrir Square between the police and organized protesters.
January 28: Numbers of protesters increase and Mubarak declares a curfew in Cairo, Alexandria and Suez. He also deploys the army. Mubarak sacks his cabinet and makes a statement sympathizing with the protesters’ grievances. In addition, he defends the actions of his security forces.
January 29: Mubarak appoints his Intelligence chief Omar Suleiman as vice-president and Aviation Minister Ahmed Shafiq is appointed prime minister.
January 30: F-16 fighter jets began flying low and slow over the growing crowds as a form of psychological intimidation.
January 31: The Egyptian army says it recognizes the “legitimate rights of the people” and will not use force against them.
February 1: Huge rallies take place in Cairo and other cities after protest leaders call for a “march of a million”.
February 1: In another televised address, Mubarak announces he will step down after September’s presidential elections. He pledges constitutional reform but says he should stay in office to ensure an orderly transfer of power to his successor. Protest leaders say the president needs to step down first.
February 2: Prime Minister David Cameron and United Nations secretary general, Ban Ki-moon condemns ‘despicable’ violence in Egypt.
February 2: The army urges demonstrators to return to their homes, saying their message has been heard. Clashes break out between pro- and anti-Mubarak groups as supporters of the president make an organized civil attempt to enter Tahrir Square.
February 3: Anti-government protesters clash with groups of government loyalists once again.
February 3: Heavy gunfire heard in Cairo’s Liberation square as night falls. Protesters die from gunshot wounds.
February 3: Stories surfaced, and reported by BBC Arabic Service that Mubarak’s wife Suzanne, his two sons Alaa and Gamal, and their families took a private jet to Heathrow airport. A flurry of twitter messages seemed to confirm the glamorous evacuation, with reported sightings of the Mubarak family at Heathrow airport and in Central London. One report claimed they brought with them a grand total of 97 pieces of luggage.
February 3: In Washington, U.S. officials said Thursday that talks were under way between the Obama administration and top Egyptian officials regarding Mubarak’s possible immediate resignation.
February 4: Rounds of gunfire were heard early Thursday at Tahrir Square. Three protesters killed by gunfire in Cairo, least two dead in Cairo’s central Tahrir Square in the early hours on Thursday
February 4: Huge crowds again occupy Tahrir Square in what protest leaders call “the day of departure” for President Mubarak.
February 4: David Cameron said that if the Egyptian regime uses violence on protesters in Cairo today it will lose any remaining international credibility it has left. Cameron and French President Nicolas Sarkozy warned that a protracted standoff could increase popular support for the Muslim Brotherhood and other radical clerical religious groups. EU leaders at the summit shied away from echoing the Obama administration’s calls for Mubarak to step down. Instead, the summit’s final statement only called for the democratic aspirations of Egyptian citizens to be addressed through dialogue and political reform, underlying that “this transition process must start now.”
February 4: Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi, meanwhile, defended Mubarak at the summit. Berlusconi called for “continuity” and a transition in Egypt “without a break from a president like Mubarak, who in the West, above all in the U.S., was always considered the wisest of men.
February 4: There was no mention of any punitive measures against Mubarak, such as the sanctions imposed against Belarus after President Alexander Lukashenko’s crackdown against pro-democracy activists, or the freezing of assets similar to Tunisia’s ousted president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali.
February 4: Lawmakers in the European Parliament criticized the EU leaders for choosing the “easy option” of simply condemning the violence and calling for restraint. The German Socialist leader in the European Parliament, Martin Schulz, said “They need to be much tougher and make it clear that Europe will not tolerate Mubarak clinging desperately to power. “On foreign policy issues, the EU too often behaves like a frightened rabbit in the headlights of a car,” he added. “The EU summit should use all its weight to ensure that today is Mubarak’s day of departure.”
February 5: Gunfire reported at Liberation square, army Troops now repeal Mubarak’s loyalists.
February 5: The leadership of the ruling National Democratic Party resigns en masse, including Gamal Mubarak, the son of the president.
February 5: Secretary of State Hilary Rodham Clinton said, speaking at a Munich security conference to leaders to support this process of transition endorsing Mr. Suleiman as the leader. Mrs. Clinton said Mr. Mubarak, having taken himself and Gamal out of the September elections, was already effectively sidelined. She emphasized the need for Egypt to reform within constitution constraints, to make a vote credible. “That is what the government has said it is trying to do,”. NOTE: Clinton’s statement suggested that Washington was not insisting that Mubarak leave office first. According to the Times, she said that Mubarak, having announced that he would not seek reelection in September, has in effect taken himself out of the political picture.
February 5: She also stressed the dangers of holding elections without adequate preparation. “Revolutions have overthrown dictators in the name of democracy, only to see the process hijacked by new autocrats who uses violence, deception and rigged elections to stay in power,” she said. Her emphasis on a deliberate process was repeated by German Merkel and British Cameron. Mrs. Merkel mentioned her past as a democracy activist in East Germany, recalling the impatience of protesters after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, to immediately join democratic West Germany. But, the process took a year, and it was time well spent, she said. “There will be a change in Egypt,” Mrs. Merkel said, “but clearly, the change has to be shaped in a way that it is a peaceful, a sensible way forward.” NOTE: this is like knocking down the wall but don’t knock down the whole Berlin wall? NOTE 2: The U.S. government’s calling for gradual change was supported by Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain, Turkey’s foreign minister, Ahmet Davutoglu and other countries represented at the conference. NOTE 3: It appeared that the U.S. and its allies have decided that the best and safest way out of the crisis in Egypt — a tinderbox that threatens to incite unrest in other Middle Eastern nations — is a gradual change in government led by Suleiman. He is a key figure in Egypt’s establishment and has backing from the military.
February 5: Vice President Biden spoke by phone Saturday with Suleiman and stressed “the need for a concrete reform agenda, a clear timeline, and immediate steps that demonstrate to the public and the opposition that the Egyptian government is committed to reform,”.
February 5: The United States, and the other like-minded governments, are seeking a transition to democratic pluralism that would keep the Muslim Brotherhood from becoming a dominant political force in the post-Mubarak era, according to Carl Bernstein, writing in The Daily Beast Saturday.
February 5: Obama and Hillary Clinton “have been working toward a solution that would permit him [Mubarak] to stay for a brief period as a powerless, de facto head of state,” Bernstein wrote. “He would remain as such until new mechanisms, and perhaps a new Egyptian constitution, are in place.”
February 5: Carl Bernstein Mr. Pulitzer Prize weiner, Washington bureau chief and correspondent for ABC News states a transition government under Suleiman could amend the constitution, end the state of emergency under, which Murabak has ruled since 1981, and propose reforms including rights to assembly, free speech, religious freedom, presidential term limits, and the rules for the next presidential election, set for September. Hillary Clinton would later regurgitate this Bernstein statement.
February 5: Meantime, in Cairo, it was not clear whether a gradual transition would satisfy the pro-democracy protest movement which has demanded Mubarak’s overthrow and the creation of a reformist government.
February 5: An assassination attempt on General Suleiman earlier this week was reported by Fox News and other media outlets but denied by the Egyptian government. Still, Fox News said a motorcade accompanying Suleiman was attacked but the general was not harmed. In Munich, Secretary of State Clinton took note of the unconfirmed assassination attempt.
February 5: Al Arabiya television and other news media falsely reported that Mubarak had resigned as head of the national ruling party.
February 5: A day after President Obama pushed Mubarak to leave quickly, the U.S. administration changed tone with a strong endorsement of Suleiman’s plans. “It’s important to support the transition process announced by the Egyptian government actually headed by now-Vice President Omar Suleiman,” Clinton said at an international security conference in Munich, Germany. She warned that without orderly change, extremists could derail the process.
February 5: A U.S. envoy who met Mubarak earlier this week, former ambassador Frank Wisner, went further still, saying it is “crucial” that Mubarak remain in place for the time being to ensure reforms go through. He pointed out that under the constitution, a Mubarak resignation would require new elections in two months, meaning they would take place under the current rules that all but guarantee a ruling party victory. His comment was an abrupt change in message — on Friday, Obama called on Mubarak to “make the right decision.” The State Department later said Wisner was speaking as a private citizen since his official mission to Egypt had ended.
February 6: U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said forcing Mubarak to leave office quickly could complicate the transition. She noted that if Mubarak resigned, Egypt’s constitution election would be required within 60 days. “The Egyptians are the ones who are having to grapple with the reality of what they must do,” she said, adding that it could take time. “I am not going to be pre-judging who should participate in their political process.” In an interview airing Sunday on National Public Radio, Clinton was noncommittal about the fundamentalist group’s role in talks to try to end Egypt’s political crisis, but she said the decision suggests “at least they are now involved.” Clinton says the U.S. has been very clear about what it expects in the transition process to a new government in Egypt. The United States, she says, along with the people of Egypt want to see an orderly transition that leads to free and fair elections. After which, President Obama now demanded publicly, change in Egypt must begin right away, now and abandoned Suleiman as a leader of change.
February 6: The leadership of Egypt’s ruling party stepped down Saturday as the military figures spearheading the transition tried to placate protesters without giving them the one resignation they demand — Mubarak’s. The United States gave key backing to the regime’s gradual changes, warning of the dangers if Mubarak goes too quickly.
February 6: Egypt’s Vice President Omar Suleiman met with other opposition leaders and the Muslim Brotherhood. According to state-run TV, Suleiman also meet with representatives of the “January 25″ movement. But in Tahrir Square, some protesters slammed the idea that anyone representing them would meet with Suleiman. “This is an insult to people like us, activists. Who are they to speak on behalf of the revolution?” asked Gigi Ibrahim. “I did not hear of any January 25 group when the revolution started,” added protester Wael Abbas. “Only now I am hearing these rumors. But I don’t know who they are because they definitely do not represent us.”
February 6: Mohamed ElBaradei, the former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency has returned as a major opposition figure, and told CNN there was “a huge question of credibility” involving the Egyptian regime. “Mubarak is a symbol of an outgoing regime and people have no credibility,” ElBaradei said. “If he doesn’t leave, you know, the regime would retrench and then come back, you know, with vengeance.” While speaking at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government on 27 April 2010, ElBaradei joked that he was “looking for a job” and is seeking to be an “agent of change and an advocate for democracy” within Egyptian politics.
February 6: King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia backs Mubarak. ‘the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia … declares it stands with all its resources with the government of Egypt,’ he is quoted as saying.
February 6: Both AP and al-Jazeera report that 19 private jets carrying the families of wealthy businessmen have departed Cairo for Dubai.
February 7: Reports begin to pile up that Mubarak has cash in British and Swiss banks plus UK and US property. President Hosni Mubarak’s family fortune could be as much as $70bn (£43.5bn) according to analysis by Middle East experts, with much of his wealth in British and Swiss banks or tied up in real estate in London, New York, Los Angeles and along expensive tracts of the Red Sea coast. Arabic newspaper Al Khabar, reports Mubarak has properties in Manhattan and exclusive Beverly Hills addresses on Rodeo Drive.
February 8: Egypt protests draw biggest crowd to date.
February 10: Ruling party officials say Mubarak will step down. But Mubarak then surprises protesters in another televised speech in, which he says he will stay in office until elections in September, though he will transfer some powers to his deputy Omar Suleiman.
February 10: Denmark Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen calls on Egypt’s Mubarak To Resign. Denmark’s prime minister became the first European Union leader to publicly support Egypt protesters. Well, Town Hall Square in Copenhagen, Denmark on Saturday, Feb. 5, 2011 had thousands of protesters gathered to support the anti-government movement in Egypt.
February 11: Mubarak resigns on the 18th day of protests and reaches the Red Sea resort of Sharm-el-Sheikh, his favorite holiday destination. Suleiman announces that Mubarak will step down, with immediate effect.
February 12: The Swiss government ordered a freeze on any assets belonging to Egyptian President. London and USA banks do not follow the Swiss governments’ leadership.
___________________________________________________________________________________
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/26/egypt-protests
Egypt protests: ‘We ran a gauntlet of officers beating us with sticks’
Jack Shenker, the Guardian’s reporter in Cairo, was beaten and arrested alongside protesters in the capital last night. He made this remarkable recording while locked in the back of a security forces truck next to dozens of protesters.
At one o’clock in the morning, after a day covering the protests across the Egyptian capital, I found myself in Abdel Munim Riyad square, a downtown traffic junction close to Tahrir, Cairo’s central plaza, which had been occupied by demonstrators for several hours. Egyptian security forces had just launched an attack on Tahrir and thousands of people were now pouring in my direction, teargas heavy in the air. A few hundred rallied in front of me on Al Galaa Street; spying an empty police truck in the road, several people began to smash it up, eventually tipping it over and setting it on fire.
In the distance, riot police could be seen advancing from Tahrir. I called the news desk to report that violence was spreading; while I was on the phone the police began to charge, sending me and several hundred protesters running. A short distance away I stopped, believing it safe; a number of ordinarily dressed young men were running in my direction and I assumed them to be protesters also fleeing the police charge behind them. Yet as two of them reached me I was punched by both simultaneously and thrown to the ground, before being hauled back up by the scruff of the neck and dragged towards the police lines.
The men were burly and wore leather jackets – up close I could see they were amin dowla, plain-clothes officers from Egypt’s notorious state security service. All attempts I made to tell them in Arabic and English that I was an international journalist were met with more punches and slaps; around me I could make out other isolated protesters also being hauled along, receiving the same treatment.
We were being dragged towards a security building on the edge of the square, two streets away from my apartment, and as I approached the doorway of the building other security officers took flying kicks and punches at me. I spotted a high-ranking uniformed officer and shouted at him that I was a British journalist. He responded by walking over and punching me twice, saying in Arabic, “Fuck you and fuck Britain”.
Cairo interactive Follow Shenker’s journey with our interactive
Other protesters and I were thrown through the doorway, where we had to run a gauntlet of officers beating us with sticks. Inside we were pushed against the wall; our mobiles and wallets were removed. Officers walked up and down ordering us to face the wall and not look back, as more and more protesters were brought in behind us. Anyone who turned round was instantly hit. After approximately an hour we were dragged out again one by one.
Outside we were loaded on to one of the green central security trucks that had been ubiquitous throughout the streets that day. The steps up to the vehicle were short and narrow, and the doorway into the pitch-black holding area inside the truck barely wide enough to fit a single person – my head was smashed against the metal door frame by a policeman as I entered. Inside, dozens of protesters were already packed in and crouched in the darkness – the trucks have barely any windows, just a handful of thick metal grates through which it is impossible to see anything. There were 44 of us inside the tiny space.
With barely room to move, the temperature rose quickly and several people fainted. Many of the protesters were nursing severe wounds, visible by occasional flashes of streetlight that came through the grates.
I realized I still had my dictaphone and started making recordings, describing what was happening and interviewing those around me. The truck drove east at top speed, towards the outskirts of the city – whenever it slowed or veered round a corner we were all sent flying. One protester, a diabetic, had slipped into a coma and was clearly in a grave medical condition; despite banging the side of the truck and shouting through the grates, we couldn’t get the drivers to stop.
We eventually pulled up outside a government security headquarters on the desert fringes of the city. After a long delay a policeman unlocked the door to try to extract a specific prisoner called “Nour” – a young activist who is the son of Ayman Nour, a prominent dissident. As one we charged at the doorway, sending him flying and spilling out on the street. The unconscious protester was carried out and cars flagged down to take him to hospital. The rest of us had to find a way of making our own way back to city.
Recent Comments